Defining Alternatives

February 2026

Building a Risk-Balanced Portfolio for Volatile Markets

Defining Alternatives

Have You Done Enough to Diversify Your Portfolio?

Introducing Balanced Risk Strategies to Your Clients

Put simply, what are alternatives? Think of traditional investments as long-only public stocks, public bonds, or cash. Anything else can generally be considered part of the alternative investment universe.

Investment managers that we partner with at Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC and Rational Advisors, Inc. specialize in liquid alternatives, which typically have goals such as adding alpha, reducing correlation to market indexes, and mitigating downside risk.

David Miller, Co-Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Catalyst and Rational, believes investors need to think about avoiding downfalls and adding more uncorrelated return streams, and that investing in alternatives may be one way to do this.

A 60% stock/40% bond allocation may not be enough to offer a downside hedge (as demonstrated by the 2022 bond and equity bear market) and research shows that losses could have been mitigated if investors had allocated among a greater number of uncorrelated return streams. He states:

“Alternatives in and of themselves are neither good nor bad. If an alternative or traditional strategy has a high risk-adjusted return, it is objectively good to have it in a portfolio. If it doesn’t, it has no place. So investing in alternatives really isn’t, or at least it shouldn’t be, an opinion. It is a math problem which has a right and a wrong answer.”

In highlighting the power of integrating noncorrelated strategies into a portfolio, Miller explains further:

“If you have four equal-returning, equal-risk assets that are uncorrelated, you cut your risk in half without reducing your return.

If you have nine equal-returning, equal-risk assets that are uncorrelated, you cut your risk by two-thirds without reducing your return.

If you have 25 equal-returning, equal-risk assets that are uncorrelated, you cut your risk by 80% (four-fifths) without reducing your return.

The math is objective, which means that a traditional 60% equity/40% bond portfolio is objectively the wrong answer, as that is only two return streams. Combining multiple uncorrelated return streams is objectively the correct answer.

You shouldn’t be asking should you or should you not invest in alternatives. Rather, the question is really, “how do you identify multiple uncorrelated return streams beyond stocks and bonds so you can get to a better risk adjusted return?”

Invest Like the Institutions

Alternative investments have been utilized by institutions for decades to deliver a better investing experience for clients. Professional investors often struggle to balance client (and perhaps their own) internal struggles between the fear of missing out and risk aversion. We continue to hear too many stories about buying at the market highs and selling in panic near the market lows – a path which can be destructive to an investor’s long-term objectives.

Whether you are an institutional investor or an end client, most investors are generally not good at timing the market. Alternatives can play an important role in helping clients overcome this seemingly unbridgeable gap without the need to time the stock market. As shown below, when integrated into a portfolio of traditional assets, alternatives offer the potential to both enhance returns and mitigate losses. Manager access, perception of costs, and high investment minimums have historically been the reason why, according to a 2023 Fidelity study, the average allocation to alternatives among institutions has been 23%, versus only 6% among retail investors.1

If the landscape were simplified, we believe more investors would consider alternatives and make them an essential part of their approach. There is a reason why so many knowledgeable institutional investors have decided to include a larger allocation to alternatives.

Why You Are Missing Out with Only Stocks and Bonds

A 60/40 Stock/Bond Portfolio Has Historically Provided Limited Diversification Benefits as the Monthly Returns are Highly Correlated to Returns of the S&P 500.

Scatter chart of 60/40 Portfolio Monthly Returns versus S&P 500 TR Index Monthly Returns showing high correlation

Data Source: Bloomberg LP and Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. Based on monthly return data from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2025. Stocks are represented by the S&P 500 TR Index; bonds are represented by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. See important disclosures at the end of this presentation, including with respect to the inherent limitations of hypothetical performance comparisons.

1 A Study of Allocations to Alternative Investments by Institutions and Financial Advisors, May 15, 2024, https://institutional.fidelity.com/app/proxy/content?literatureURL=/9909709.PDF

Liquid Alternatives Category Matrix

This table reinforces the breadth of possibilities for liquid alternatives as compared to traditional investment approaches.

Some financial professionals may feel the mountain is too hard to summit to get clients on board with selecting the appropriate liquid alternative option(s) given the differences between approaches and even material differences between funds implementing a particular approach (i.e., managed futures strategies may vary materially in their approach and risk/return profiles).

Liquid Alternatives Category Matrix comparing Traditional and Alternative Approaches across Traditional and Alternative Assets

This challenge can be overcome by understanding the goal liquid alternatives should serve as well as knowing how to integrate the liquid alternative into a client’s existing portfolio.

Learn this and more by reading our other papers on balanced risk, Introduction to Balanced Risk, Goals and Integration of Liquid Alternatives, and The Math of Diversification, or by visiting CatalystMF.com and RationalMF.com for additional information about our full product lineup and how our alternatives can help provide your clients with diversification benefits.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, RISKS, CHARGES AND EXPENSES OF LIQUID ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS. THIS AND OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANY SUCH FUND IS CONTAINED IN THE FUND’S PROSPECTUS, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED BY CALLING 866.447.4228 OR AT WWW.CATALYSTMF.COM OR WWW.RATIONALMF.COM, AS APPLICABLE. THE RELEVANT PROSPECTUS SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING. BOTH THE CATALYST FUNDS AND THE RATIONAL FUNDS ARE DISTRIBUTED BY NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, MEMBER FINRA/SIPC. NEITHER CATALYST CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC NOR RATIONAL ADVISORS, INC. ARE AFFILIATED WITH NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC.

Risk Considerations

Though the objectives, strategies and assets traded may differ significantly across liquid alternative approaches, investing in liquid alternatives generally carries certain risks. These risks may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Certain funds may invest a percentage of their assets in derivatives, such as futures and options contracts. The use of such derivatives and the resulting high portfolio turn-over may expose such funds to additional risks that they would not be subject to if they invested directly in the securities and commodities underlying those derivatives. These funds may experience losses that exceed those experienced by funds that do not use futures contracts, options and hedging strategies. Investing in commodities markets may subject a fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Currency trading risks include market risk, credit risk and country risk. Foreign investing involves risks not typically associated with U.S. investments. Changes in interest rates and the liquidity of certain investments could affect a fund’s overall performance. Other risks include U.S. Government securities risks and investments in fixed income securities. Typically, a rise in interest rates causes a decline in the value of fixed income securities or derivatives owned by a fund. Furthermore, the use of leverage can magnify the potential for gain or loss and amplify the effects of market volatility on a fund’s share price. All funds are subject to regulatory change and tax risks; changes to current rules could increase costs associated with an investment in a fund.

The value of a fund may decrease in response to the activities and financial prospects of an individual security or group of securities held in a fund’s portfolio. Investments in foreign securities could subject a Fund to greater risks, including currency fluctuation, economic conditions, and different governmental and accounting standards. A fund’s portfolio may be focused on a limited number of industries, asset classes, countries or issuers. Certain funds may invest in high yield or junk bonds, which present a greater risk than bonds of higher quality. Other risks may include credit risks and interest rate risk, particularly with respect to floating rate loan funds. Changes in short-term market interest rates will directly affect the yield on the shares of a fund whose investments are normally invested in floating rate debt. Floating rate loan funds tend to be illiquid, and a fund might be unable to sell the loan in a timely manner as the secondary market is generally a private, unregulated inter-dealer or inter-bank re-sale market.

Any or all of the foregoing risk factors may affect the value of your investment.

Hypothetical Performance Limitations

The blended portfolio returns set forth herein represent a series of differently weighted portfolios comprised of index returns; you cannot invest in indices and no fees taken out of indices; any such blended portfolio returns should be considered hypothetical in nature. You are cautioned that hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described herein. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown or will not be able to avoid substantial losses. In fact, frequently there are sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual performance results subsequently achieved by a particular portfolio of investments. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, the construction of a hypothetical portfolio of investments does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical portfolio of investments can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or the implementation of a portfolio of investments which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results, all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. You cannot invest directly in an index and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.

Glossary of Index Definitions

S&P 500 Index Total Return: A market-capitalization-weighted index of 500 leading publicly traded companies in the U.S that also includes dividend gains. Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index: A market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the performance of the U.S. investment grade bond market with maturities of more than one year.

An Introduction to Balanced Risk

February 2026

Building a Risk-Balanced Portfolio for Volatile Markets

An Introduction to Balanced Risk

Are You Doing Enough to Ward off Volatility for Turbulent Times?

You Might Be Missing Out if You’re Only Considering Stocks and Bonds

Diversification is often referred to as the only free lunch in investing. But while most financial professionals understand the potential benefits of diversification, some are still relying primarily on stocks and bonds to construct portfolios.

If investors are not also considering an allocation to alternatives, it is our belief that not only are they foregoing diversification, but they’re also missing out on an investment universe that has a demonstrated ability to perform independent of stocks and bonds when traditional investments struggle.

In our balanced risk series, we’ll remove the barriers to entry and help advisors explain the potential benefits of investing in liquid alternatives.

Liquid Alternatives symbol

Liquid Alternatives

Liquid alternatives are investment funds (like ETFs and mutual funds) that use complex, hedge fund-like strategies, such as long/short, derivatives, and leverage.

However, these strategies are packaged for everyday investors, offering daily liquidity, transparency, and diversification from traditional stocks and bonds, aiming to provide returns in different market conditions.

The Benefits of Liquid Alternatives

Liquid alternatives can provide many potential benefits to a portfolio. Consider a balanced risk strategy (or hybrid strategy), which maintains exposure to traditional asset classes while adding on exposure to a non-correlated strategy like managed futures.

A balanced risk strategy is often an ideal option for those looking to integrate alternatives that have the potential to perform well during periods of market turmoil, but does not sacrifice the exposure they already have to a traditional investment allocation.

To show the potential power of balanced risk strategies (and their managed futures component), on the next page is an allocation which incorporates a balanced risk strategy into a more traditional stock and bond approach. As you’ll see, the addition of a balanced risk strategy to a traditional portfolio generally would have provided investors with higher returns and shallower drawdowns.

We also want to highlight that by using a balanced risk strategy, investors are not losing their exposure to stocks and bonds by implementing alternatives.

How Adding a Balanced Risk Strategy Can Enhance a Portfolio

Five pie charts showing increasing allocations to a Balanced Risk strategy
60% Stocks
40% Bonds
54% Stocks
36% Bonds
10% Balanced Risk
48% Stocks
32% Bonds
20% Balanced Risk
42% Stocks
28% Bonds
30% Balanced Risk
36% Stocks
24% Bonds
40% Balanced Risk
Annualized Return 6.75% 7.27% 7.78% 8.26% 8.73%
Volatility 9.46% 9.20% 9.15% 9.30% 9.65%
Return/Risk 0.71 0.79 0.85 0.89 0.90
Worst Drawdown 32.54% 30.57% 28.57% 26.54% 24.69%

Data Source: Bloomberg LP and Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. Based on monthly return data from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2025. Stocks are represented by the S&P 500 TR Index; bonds are represented by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index; Balanced Risk Strategy is represented by 100% notional exposure to SG CTA Trend Index, 50% allocation to the S&P 500 and a 50% allocation to the Bloomberg US Short Treasury TR Index (to represent collateral for futures program). Rebalanced monthly. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See important disclosures at the end of this presentation, including with respect to the limitations inherent to hypothetical performance comparisons.

Growth of $100: Outperformance of Balanced Risk (Hybrid) Strategy’s Offense and Defense Approach

Growth of $100 chart comparing Balanced Risk Strategy, S&P 500 TR Index, and 60/40 Portfolio from 1999 to 2025

Data Source: Bloomberg LP and Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. Based on monthly return data from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2025. Graph presented in logarithmic scale. 60%/40% Portfolio represented by 60% allocation to the S&P 500 TR Index (“S&P 500”) and 40% allocation to the Bloomberg Agg TR Index (“Agg”) rebalanced monthly. Balanced Risk Strategy represented by 100% notional exposure to SG CTA Trend Index, 50% allocation to the S&P 500 and a 50% allocation to the Bloomberg US Short Treasury TR Index (to represent collateral for futures program), rebalanced monthly. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See important disclosures at the end of this presentation, including with respect to the limitations inherent to hypothetical performance comparisons.

A Balanced Risk Strategy has Historically Had Zero Negative Rolling 3-Year, 5-Year, and 10-Year Periods

Bar chart of positive rolling period percentages for Balanced Risk Strategy versus S&P 500 over 3, 5, and 10 years

The ability of a hybrid strategy to play offense and defense has resulted in more consistent returns.

Data source: Bloomberg LP and Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. Based on monthly return data from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2025. Balanced Risk Strategy represented by 100% notional exposure to SG CTA Trend Index, 50% allocation to the S&P 500 and a 50% allocation to the Bloomberg US Short Treasury TR Index (to represent collateral for futures program), rebalanced monthly. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See important disclosures at the end of this presentation, including with respect to the limitations inherent to hypothetical performance comparisons.

Building a risk-balanced portfolio begins with understanding balanced risk.

Learn more by reading our other balanced risk papers, Defining Alternatives, Goals and Integration of Liquid Alternatives, and The Math of Diversification, or by visiting CatalystMF.com and RationalMF.com for additional information about our full product lineup and how our alternatives can help provide your clients with diversification benefits.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, RISKS, CHARGES AND EXPENSES OF LIQUID ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS. THIS AND OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANY SUCH FUND IS CONTAINED IN THE FUND’S PROSPECTUS, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED BY CALLING 866.447.4228 OR AT WWW.CATALYSTMF.COM OR WWW.RATIONALMF.COM, AS APPLICABLE. THE RELEVANT PROSPECTUS SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING. BOTH THE CATALYST FUNDS AND THE RATIONAL FUNDS ARE DISTRIBUTED BY NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, MEMBER FINRA/SIPC. NEITHER CATALYST CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC NOR RATIONAL ADVISORS, INC. ARE AFFILIATED WITH NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC.

Risk Considerations

Though the objectives, strategies and assets traded may differ significantly across liquid alternative approaches, investing in liquid alternatives generally carries certain risks. These risks may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Certain funds may invest a percentage of their assets in derivatives, such as futures and options contracts. The use of such derivatives and the resulting high portfolio turn-over may expose such funds to additional risks that they would not be subject to if they invested directly in the securities and commodities underlying those derivatives. These funds may experience losses that exceed those experienced by funds that do not use futures contracts, options and hedging strategies. Investing in commodities markets may subject a fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Currency trading risks include market risk, credit risk and country risk. Foreign investing involves risks not typically associated with U.S. investments. Changes in interest rates and the liquidity of certain investments could affect a fund’s overall performance. Other risks include U.S. Government securities risks and investments in fixed income securities. Typically, a rise in interest rates causes a decline in the value of fixed income securities or derivatives owned by a fund. Furthermore, the use of leverage can magnify the potential for gain or loss and amplify the effects of market volatility on a fund’s share price. All funds are subject to regulatory change and tax risks; changes to current rules could increase costs associated with an investment in a fund.

The value of a fund may decrease in response to the activities and financial prospects of an individual security or group of securities held in a fund’s portfolio. Investments in foreign securities could subject a Fund to greater risks, including currency fluctuation, economic conditions, and different governmental and accounting standards. A fund’s portfolio may be focused on a limited number of industries, asset classes, countries or issuers. Certain funds may invest in high yield or junk bonds, which present a greater risk than bonds of higher quality. Other risks may include credit risks and interest rate risk, particularly with respect to floating rate loan funds. Changes in short-term market interest rates will directly affect the yield on the shares of a fund whose investments are normally invested in floating rate debt. Floating rate loan funds tend to be illiquid, and a fund might be unable to sell the loan in a timely manner as the secondary market is generally a private, unregulated inter-dealer or inter-bank re-sale market.

Any or all of the foregoing risk factors may affect the value of your investment.

Hypothetical Performance Limitations

The blended portfolio returns set forth herein represent a series of differently weighted portfolios comprised of index returns; you cannot invest in indices and no fees taken out of indices; any such blended portfolio returns should be considered hypothetical in nature. You are cautioned that hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described herein. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown or will not be able to avoid substantial losses. In fact, frequently there are sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual performance results subsequently achieved by a particular portfolio of investments. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, the construction of a hypothetical portfolio of investments does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical portfolio of investments can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or the implementation of a portfolio of investments which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results, all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. You cannot invest directly in an index and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.

Glossary of Index Definitions

S&P 500 Index Total Return: A market-capitalization-weighted index of 500 leading publicly traded companies in the U.S that also includes dividend gains. Bloomberg US Short Treasury Total Return Index: Tracks the market for treasury bills, notes, and bonds issued by the US government. Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index: A market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the performance of the U.S. investment grade bond market with maturities of more than one year. SG CTA Trend Index: A subset of the SG CTA Index and follows traders of trend following methodologies.

The Math of Diversification

February 2026

Building a Risk-Balanced Portfolio for Volatile Markets

The Math of Diversification

Integrating Alternative Investments Requires an Analytical Approach

Examining Efficient Frontier, Managed Futures, Drawdown, and Correlation

We believe an allocation to alternatives offers investors diversification and exposure to a universe that can perform independent of stocks and bonds during market struggles.

Determining the size of the allocation requires an analytical approach. The amount must be significant enough for the liquid alternative to achieve its intended goals across the entire portfolio while still meeting the client’s return targets.

As an example, a 1% allocation to an alternative that thrives in bear markets may have limited overall impact.

While a 50% allocation to that same alternative would likely dramatically reduce long-term returns.

In seeking to focus on an analytical approach, we suggest starting with the efficient frontier.

Efficient Frontier explanation

The chart on the following page presents a series of portfolios allocated between stocks and bonds (darker blue series). It then presents a starting 60/40 stock/bond portfolio and reduces the stocks and bonds on a pro rata basis to allocate to a balanced risk, or hybrid, strategy (as previously discussed and further expanded upon herein), with increasing allocations to the balanced risk strategy (lighter blue series).

Efficient Frontier: A Case for Allocating 10% to 20% of a Portfolio to a Balanced Risk Strategy

Efficient Frontier chart of Annualized Return versus Annualized Volatility

Data Source: Bloomberg LP and Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. Based on monthly return data from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2025. Stocks are represented by the S&P 500 TR Index; bonds are represented by the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index; Balanced Risk Strategy (or Hybrid) is represented by 100% notional exposure to SG CTA Index, 50% allocation to the S&P 500, and 50% allocation to the Bloomberg US Short Treasury TR Index (to represent collateral for futures program). Rebalanced monthly. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See important disclosures at the end of this presentation, including with respect to the limitations inherent to hypothetical performance comparison.

Managed Futures: A Building Block of Balanced Risk Strategies

Managed Futures explanation

This chart compares the performance of U.S. equities and that of a traditional 60/40 portfolio to an alternative managed futures index during recent bear markets.

Bar chart comparing U.S. Equities, 60/40 Portfolio, and Managed Futures during the Credit Crisis, COVID-19, and the 2022 Slump

Source: Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC and Bloomberg LP. U.S. Equities represented by the S&P 500 Total Return Index. 60/40 Portfolio represented by 60% S&P 500 TR Index and 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate TR Bond Index. Managed Futures represented by the BarclayHedge BTOP50 Index.

Our Experts Explain Managed Futures

While traditional asset classes exhibited significant drawdowns during periods of stock market turmoil, managed futures demonstrated stronger, positive performance.

If an investor had allocated a portion of their portfolio to managed futures during the bear markets shown in the prior chart, they would have experienced less severe drawdowns and may have been able to capitalize on gains when market volatility subsided.

Managed futures offer an effective way for investors to hedge their portfolios during times of market uncertainty, notes Emmett Fitzgerald, Head of U.S. Business Development and Strategy at Aspect Capital.

For those uncertain about entering this space, Fitzgerald notes that while it may seem new to clients, managed futures are a time-tested approach.

The industry has a long history stretching back to the late 1940s. Since then, the technology and techniques used to capture market effects have evolved, but the drivers of these effects, such as human behavioral biases, have generally remained a persistent feature of markets. I’d advise entering the space with a manager with history and experience, one which has successfully navigated a wide range of market environments and demonstrated robust risk management.

Emmett Fitzgerald, Aspect

Michael Sherbert, Managing Director at Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, notes that while traditional stock/bond portfolios have served investors well over the long-run, it’s not a foolproof system since there are times when these asset classes are correlated. Introducing managed futures adds another element and return stream.

Millburn utilizes machine-learning techniques in managed futures investing, which seek to remove the human bias from investing and adapt to changing environments based on the systematic observation and analysis of historical market cycles.

Managed futures offer the potential to increase diversification, accessing global markets across a range of asset classes outside of equity and fixed income, including currency and commodity markets. And unlike some other alternative investments, managed futures are typically very liquid with full price transparency.

Michael Sherbert, Millburn

In terms of discussing managed futures with clients new to the space, Sherbert says to look at the investment from two perspectives: as a stand-alone investment and in the context of their overall portfolio.

Make sure you understand the function of the investment in the portfolio. This will give you the confidence to stick with it and enable you to realize any potential long-term benefits.

Michael Sherbert, Millburn

Returns Versus Worst Drawdowns: Highlighting the Value That a Balanced-Risk Strategy Can Add to a Portfolio in Mitigating Pain Points

Chart of Annualized Return versus Worst Drawdown

Data source: Bloomberg LP and Catalyst Capital Advisors LLC. Based on monthly return data from 12/31/1999 to 12/31/2025. Balanced Risk Strategy represented by 100% notional exposure to SG CTA Trend Index, 50% allocation to the S&P 500 and a 50% allocation to the Bloomberg US Short Treasury TR Index (to represent collateral for futures program), rebalanced monthly. Past performance does not guarantee future results. See important disclosures at the end of this presentation, including with respect to the limitations inherent to hypothetical performance comparisons.

Combining Uncorrelated Assets is Key to Maximizing the Benefits of Diversification

The formula for returns is relatively straightforward: the expected return is the weighted average of returns of the investments in the portfolio. For example, if you combine 10 investments each with an 8% expected return, then the portfolio’s expected return is 8%.

Nobel Laureate investor, Harry Markowitz, demonstrated that portfolio volatility could be reduced by diversifying investments, and that maximum benefits could be achieved when the correlation between investments is zero. In other words, if you combine 10 investments, each with a 15% expected volatility, in a portfolio and they are not completely correlated, then the expected portfolio volatility is reduced to less than 15%. By reducing the expected portfolio volatility, the probability of a negative year decreases and the return per risk taken increases.

The following charts graphically present the mathematical outcomes of Markowitz’s work, looking at the reduction in expected portfolio volatility and decreased probability of a negative annual return. In the examples, each investment has an 8% expected return, and therefore the expected portfolio return in any scenario is 8%. Each investment also has a 15% expected volatility. There are two series: one series showing a portfolio with investments that all have a correlation of zero to each other, meaning that there is no predictive relationship, and a second series where the investments all have a correlation of 0.75 to each other, meaning that there is a reasonable predictive relationship between the two (i.e., U.S. large-cap and U.S. small-cap stocks).

Expected Portfolio Volatility and Reduced Probability of a Negative Year charts

These are hypothetical illustrations only and should not be considered results of any actual investment or be considered investment advice.

These charts demonstrate that by going from one to ten investments in a portfolio, the expected portfolio volatility and the probability of a negative annual return both decrease. If the investments all have a correlation of 0.75 to each other, the reduction is relatively minimal. Going from one investment to ten investments each with a correlation of 0.75 to each other only reduces the probability of a negative year from approximately 30% to 27%. On the other hand, if all ten investments have no correlation (correlation = 0.00), then the probability of a negative year drops from approximately 30% to 5% as you go from one to ten investments.

What does this mean? Since alternatives tend to be uncorrelated to traditional markets and, in some instances, to each other, the more alternatives you integrate in a portfolio, the higher the likelihood you can reduce portfolio risk (or enhance portfolio returns at the same level of risk) and reduce the probability of a negative year. Some alternative strategies already combine multiple uncorrelated strategies into one approach, such as managed futures, balanced risk strategies, and systematic alpha strategies.

For financial professionals looking to only use a few alternatives, they may get the most benefit from one of these approaches rather than a single alternative that is just one uncorrelated return stream (such as long/short equities).

How Catalyst Can Help

If you have questions about how to effectively allocate, we are happy to discuss how alternatives can fit within your client portfolios or introduce you to Tyler Wilkens, our Head Portfolio Strategist.

Our teams also invest in areas of fixed income and equity markets that are not typically a focus of other managers – these include commodities, senior secured loans, special situations, tactical approaches, and often overlooked segments of mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities markets. We at Catalyst and Rational hope to become an important resource and assist in answering any questions you may have with respect to alternative investments and hope you will use this research paper to help guide your decision-making process.

Understanding the math of diversification is a critical step toward building a risk-balanced portfolio.

Learn more by reading our other papers on balanced risk, Introduction to Balanced Risk, Goals and Integration of Liquid Alternatives, and Defining Alternatives, or by visiting CatalystMF.com and RationalMF.com for additional information about our full product lineup and how our alternatives can help provide your clients with diversification benefits.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, RISKS, CHARGES AND EXPENSES OF LIQUID ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS. THIS AND OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANY SUCH FUND IS CONTAINED IN THE FUND’S PROSPECTUS, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED BY CALLING 866.447.4228 OR AT WWW.CATALYSTMF.COM OR WWW.RATIONALMF.COM, AS APPLICABLE. THE RELEVANT PROSPECTUS SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING. BOTH THE CATALYST FUNDS AND THE RATIONAL FUNDS ARE DISTRIBUTED BY NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, MEMBER FINRA/SIPC. NEITHER CATALYST CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC NOR RATIONAL ADVISORS, INC. ARE AFFILIATED WITH NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC.

Risk Considerations

Though the objectives, strategies and assets traded may differ significantly across liquid alternative approaches, investing in liquid alternatives generally carries certain risks. These risks may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Certain funds may invest a percentage of their assets in derivatives, such as futures and options contracts. The use of such derivatives and the resulting high portfolio turn-over may expose such funds to additional risks that they would not be subject to if they invested directly in the securities and commodities underlying those derivatives. These funds may experience losses that exceed those experienced by funds that do not use futures contracts, options and hedging strategies. Investing in commodities markets may subject a fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Currency trading risks include market risk, credit risk and country risk. Foreign investing involves risks not typically associated with U.S. investments. Changes in interest rates and the liquidity of certain investments could affect a fund’s overall performance. Other risks include U.S. Government securities risks and investments in fixed income securities. Typically, a rise in interest rates causes a decline in the value of fixed income securities or derivatives owned by a fund. Furthermore, the use of leverage can magnify the potential for gain or loss and amplify the effects of market volatility on a fund’s share price. All funds are subject to regulatory change and tax risks; changes to current rules could increase costs associated with an investment in a fund.

The value of a fund may decrease in response to the activities and financial prospects of an individual security or group of securities held in a fund’s portfolio. Investments in foreign securities could subject a Fund to greater risks, including currency fluctuation, economic conditions, and different governmental and accounting standards. A fund’s portfolio may be focused on a limited number of industries, asset classes, countries or issuers. Certain funds may invest in high yield or junk bonds, which present a greater risk than bonds of higher quality. Other risks may include credit risks and interest rate risk, particularly with respect to floating rate loan funds. Changes in short-term market interest rates will directly affect the yield on the shares of a fund whose investments are normally invested in floating rate debt. Floating rate loan funds tend to be illiquid, and a fund might be unable to sell the loan in a timely manner as the secondary market is generally a private, unregulated inter-dealer or inter-bank re-sale market.

Any or all of the foregoing risk factors may affect the value of your investment.

Hypothetical Performance Limitations

The blended portfolio returns set forth herein represent a series of differently weighted portfolios comprised of index returns; you cannot invest in indices and no fees taken out of indices; any such blended portfolio returns should be considered hypothetical in nature. You are cautioned that hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described herein. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown or will not be able to avoid substantial losses. In fact, frequently there are sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual performance results subsequently achieved by a particular portfolio of investments. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, the construction of a hypothetical portfolio of investments does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical portfolio of investments can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or the implementation of a portfolio of investments which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results, all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. You cannot invest directly in an index and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.

Glossary of Index Definitions

S&P 500 Index Total Return: A market-capitalization-weighted index of 500 leading publicly traded companies in the U.S that also includes dividend gains. Bloomberg US Short Treasury Total Return Index: Tracks the market for treasury bills, notes, and bonds issued by the US government. Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index: A market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the performance of the U.S. investment grade bond market with maturities of more than one year. SG CTA Trend Index: A subset of the SG CTA Index and follows traders of trend following methodologies.

Goals and Integration of Liquid Alternatives

February 2026

Building a Risk-Balanced Portfolio for Volatile Markets

Goals and Integration of Liquid Alternatives

Diversification From Traditional Assets

The Potential Benefits of Integrating Alternatives into a Portfolio

When considering an allocation to alternatives, it is useful to consider the objective of the alternative investment. In many cases, the ultimate objective of an alternative is diversification from traditional assets.

The resulting diversification to the portfolio may achieve:

  • Lower volatility
  • Enhanced returns
  • Improved risk-adjusted returns
  • Mitigated drawdowns
  • Lower correlation to traditional assets

For some alternative categories, the goal is generally the same.

As an example, long/short equity and market neutral equity strategies that perform as expected generally result in lower volatility, mitigated drawdowns, lower correlation, and improved risk-adjusted returns for a portfolio. And they seek to do all of this while using an asset class that most investors already have, equities.

In contrast, some alternative strategies require a careful review of the implementation to understand the outcome. For example, a managed futures strategy may be implemented to lower volatility and mitigate drawdowns, but not necessarily to enhance returns. On the other hand, a higher volatility managed futures strategy may not lower volatility, but may enhance returns while mitigating the extent of drawdowns and lowering the overall correlation to traditional assets.

This is in part due to the correlation differences between alternative strategies and traditional assets. While virtually all alternatives seek diversification, some are less correlated to traditional assets than others.

Misconceptions About Alternatives

Managed futures strategies are powerful tools that generally seek to mitigate the extent of stock market drawdowns given their limited correlation to equities. However, the power of the strategy is typically seen during periods of structural market changes. A flash crash or quick drawdown and recovery provides limited opportunities for new trends to develop and, accordingly, for these strategies to deliver.

The truth is that investors don’t really need a lot of protection from a flash crash if they’re already taking a long-term view. However, many investors do need to take distributions and sell investments over time, and positive returns during a prolonged bear market in stocks can make a meaningful difference.

Integrating Liquid Alternatives

When integrating alternatives, one must take several things into consideration:

Q. What are the client’s objectives and risk tolerance?

A. This is likely already established from traditional portfolio allocations (i.e., more risk-averse investors will have a smaller stock allocation). If adjustments are needed, liquid alts can be a great tool.

Q. What is the primary objective of the alternative investment?

A. Many institutional managers leverage alternatives to enhance returns and differentiate their practices. Others are looking to bring down risk and mitigate the extent of drawdowns.

Q. What will be sold to integrate the alternative?

A. Please see below, and the pie charts, for some typical allocation breakdowns.

As we continue to reinforce, liquid alternatives vary significantly in terms of approach, scope, and goals, and even funds within the same category may have different approaches and return expectations. With that said, a rule of thumb often used for lower volatility alternatives is to take 75% from fixed income and 25% from equity to raise the capital needed to allocate to alternatives. In contrast, a rule of thumb for higher volatility alternatives may take 25% from fixed-income and 75% from equities.

The pie charts below illustrate how each of these approaches might look when integrating a 15% liquid alternatives sleeve into a client’s portfolio.

Traditional 60/40 Approach, Low Volatility Approach, and High Volatility Approach pie charts

The idea behind the balanced approach to liquid alternatives is driven by the fact that many liquid alternatives are used with the goal of reducing volatility and mitigating drawdowns and tend to have risk/return profiles that fall in between stocks and bonds. The 75% fixed income recommendation emphasizes a lower volatility profile, like that of bonds, by incorporating a lower volatility alternative. Conversely, the 75% equities recommendation emphasizes a higher volatility profile, like stocks, to potentially enhance returns through a higher volatility alternative.

Although rules of thumb almost always come with caveats, the rules for liquid alternatives should be taken very lightly and rely heavily on your goals.

We recommend that financial professionals start by focusing on the goals they are trying to achieve with liquid alternatives. Some examples are outlined in the following table.

GOAL OF ALTERNATIVE: More Defensive Balanced More Aggressive
Type of Alternative Buffered Strategies
Long/Short Equity
Market Neutral
Options
Managed Futures
Hybrid Strategy
Systematic Alpha
Tactical Allocation
CTAs
MLPs
Private Equity
Real Estate
Venture Capital
Desired Portfolio Outcome Lower volatility
Mitigated drawdowns
Enhanced returns
Mitigated drawdowns
Lower correlation
Enhanced returns
Integration Options Sell equities to lower overall portfolio risk
Replaced fixed income being used for defense
Sell a balanced allocation of equities/fixed income to maintain same level of portfolio risk exposure
Sell fixed income to increase portfolio risk
Sell equities to reduce portfolio risk
Sell equities to replace source of risk
Sell fixed income to increase portfolio risk

How Investors are Currently Allocating to Alternatives

On average, financial professionals have been increasing their allocation to liquid alternatives but we believe they continue to remain under-allocated.

Cerulli Associates conducted a survey of 200 financial advisors to understand how they were allocating to alternative investments.1 The sample base tended to be advisors with clients that had higher-than-average net worth.

Tyler Wilkens, CFA, Head Portfolio Strategist at Catalyst and Rational, meets with advisors to help review portfolio objectives and existing models in order to analyze current allocations.

“I frequently talk to advisors who have a 5% or 10% allocation to liquid alts,” Wilkens said. “Depending on the specific combination of traditional and alternative investments being considered for the portfolio, the ideal weighting may be significantly higher or lower. Generally, if the goal is to substantially mitigate drawdowns without compromising returns, a weighting above 5-10% may be warranted. In such instances, the average allocation may rise to north of 15%, as advisors come to appreciate the potential benefits of diversifying portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. This would move them closer to the profile of many institutional investors.”

Learn this and more by reading our other papers on balanced risk, Introduction to Balanced Risk, Goals and Integration of Liquid Alternatives, and The Math of Diversification, or by visiting CatalystMF.com and RationalMF.com for additional information about our full product lineup and how our alternatives can help provide your clients with diversification benefits.


IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES

YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES, RISKS, CHARGES AND EXPENSES OF LIQUID ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS. THIS AND OTHER IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT ANY SUCH FUND IS CONTAINED IN THE FUND’S PROSPECTUS, WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED BY CALLING 866.447.4228 OR AT WWW.CATALYSTMF.COM OR WWW.RATIONALMF.COM, AS APPLICABLE. THE RELEVANT PROSPECTUS SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INVESTING. BOTH THE CATALYST FUNDS AND THE RATIONAL FUNDS ARE DISTRIBUTED BY NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC, MEMBER FINRA/SIPC. NEITHER CATALYST CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC NOR RATIONAL ADVISORS, INC. ARE AFFILIATED WITH NORTHERN LIGHTS DISTRIBUTORS, LLC.

Risk Considerations

Though the objectives, strategies and assets traded may differ significantly across liquid alternative approaches, investing in liquid alternatives generally carries certain risks. These risks may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: Certain funds may invest a percentage of their assets in derivatives, such as futures and options contracts. The use of such derivatives and the resulting high portfolio turn-over may expose such funds to additional risks that they would not be subject to if they invested directly in the securities and commodities underlying those derivatives. These funds may experience losses that exceed those experienced by funds that do not use futures contracts, options and hedging strategies. Investing in commodities markets may subject a fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. Currency trading risks include market risk, credit risk and country risk. Foreign investing involves risks not typically associated with U.S. investments. Changes in interest rates and the liquidity of certain investments could affect a fund’s overall performance. Other risks include U.S. Government securities risks and investments in fixed income securities. Typically, a rise in interest rates causes a decline in the value of fixed income securities or derivatives owned by a fund. Furthermore, the use of leverage can magnify the potential for gain or loss and amplify the effects of market volatility on a fund’s share price. All funds are subject to regulatory change and tax risks; changes to current rules could increase costs associated with an investment in a fund.

The value of a fund may decrease in response to the activities and financial prospects of an individual security or group of securities held in a fund’s portfolio. Investments in foreign securities could subject a Fund to greater risks, including currency fluctuation, economic conditions, and different governmental and accounting standards. A fund’s portfolio may be focused on a limited number of industries, asset classes, countries or issuers. Certain funds may invest in high yield or junk bonds, which present a greater risk than bonds of higher quality. Other risks may include credit risks and interest rate risk, particularly with respect to floating rate loan funds. Changes in short-term market interest rates will directly affect the yield on the shares of a fund whose investments are normally invested in floating rate debt. Floating rate loan funds tend to be illiquid, and a fund might be unable to sell the loan in a timely manner as the secondary market is generally a private, unregulated inter-dealer or inter-bank re-sale market.

Any or all of the foregoing risk factors may affect the value of your investment.

Hypothetical Performance Limitations

The blended portfolio returns set forth herein represent a series of differently weighted portfolios comprised of index returns; you cannot invest in indices and no fees taken out of indices; any such blended portfolio returns should be considered hypothetical in nature. You are cautioned that hypothetical performance results have many inherent limitations, some of which are described herein. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits similar to those shown or will not be able to avoid substantial losses. In fact, frequently there are sharp differences between hypothetical performance results and the actual performance results subsequently achieved by a particular portfolio of investments. One of the limitations of hypothetical performance results is that they are generally prepared with the benefit of hindsight. In addition, the construction of a hypothetical portfolio of investments does not involve financial risk, and no hypothetical portfolio of investments can completely account for the impact of financial risk in actual trading. For example, the ability to withstand losses or to adhere to a particular trading program in spite of trading losses are material points which can also adversely affect actual trading results. There are numerous other factors related to the markets in general or the implementation of a portfolio of investments which cannot be fully accounted for in the preparation of hypothetical performance results, all of which can adversely affect actual trading results. You cannot invest directly in an index and unmanaged index returns do not reflect any fees, expenses or sales charges.